Study Details | Pathways to Work

0094-Evaluation of employ

Study quality: Low

Low

Reason for the rating: This study received a low study quality rating because the intervention was always provided in combination with another factor and the effect of the intervention cannot be disentangled from the effect of that other factor.

Intervention: Hire Up

Population and employment barriers:

Specific employment barriers (Homelessness), Young adults (aged 16-24)

Services provided:

Case management, Employment retention services, Financial incentives, Supportive services, Work readiness activities (Employment coaching)

? Review services terms

Setting: Urban only

Study design

Design:

Quasi-experimental design

Study group formation:

Youth ages 18 to 23 who were living on the streets or in a homeless shelter and were physically and mentally healthy enough to hold a full-time position but had no other stable housing alternatives were eligible for the Avenues to Independence (ATI) residential program. Those who entered ATI in 1998, after Hire Up (an on-site job-readiness, placement, and mentoring program) launched, formed the intervention group, and those who participated in ATI before Hire Up was available formed the comparison group.

Time period of study:

The individuals in the intervention group began receiving services between 1998 and 2001. Outcomes were assessed at program exit (duration of service receipt was 6 to 18 months).

Pathways only reports results from studies with a study quality rating of high or moderate.

Sample characteristics

Age

Young adults

100%

Specific employment barriers

Were experiencing homelessness

100%

Intervention implementation

Implementing organization:

Larkin Street Youth Services

Intervention services:

Hire Up, a supplementary service to ATI (see comparison condition), was a job-readiness course comprising three weeks of daily three-hour sessions. Course participants learned job search skills and basic work skills while identifying promising careers and creating a career development strategy. As part of the course, youth met weekly with the program’s employment coordinator to discuss entry-level opportunities in the student’s field of interest. After placement, Hire Up coordinators continued to provide support to the employer and the former program member to ensure job retention. Youth also met monthly with a career mentor who offered guidance about career goals, current challenges, and other opportunities. All youth in the intervention group also received the services from the ATI program, described in the comparison condition.

Mandatory services:

None.

Comparison services:

The comparison group included those youth who received ATI for at least two months and did not receive Hire Up. ATI required residents to work full time in a legitimate position, as determined by the program, while the program provided them with a supportive environment in which to develop independent living skills, further their education through GED or postsecondary education courses, and pursue life goals with assistance from a case manager. While in the program, residents allocated 30 percent of their earnings to rent, which the program saved for them in an account that they transferred to clients after they completed the program.

Study publications

Rashid, Sonja (2004). Evaluating a transitional living program for homeless, former foster care youth, Research on Social Work Practice 14(4): 240-248.

View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.

The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.

Take our survey

0094-Evaluation of employ