HighStudy design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase short-term employmentOther outcome domains examined:
NoneStudy funded by:
Results
View table definitionsScroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
| Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase short-term earnings | Total earnings over follow-up period | Months 1-6 |
High
|
707.00 | 2013 dollars |
|
84 |
| Increase short-term employment | Employed at any time in follow-up period | Months 1-6 |
High
|
0.25 | percentage points |
|
84 |
Short-term outcomes are those measured 18 months or fewer after participants are first offered services. Long-term outcomes are those measured between 18 months and 5 years after participants are first offered services. Very long-term outcomes are those measured 5 years or more after participants are first offered services.
Means are not displayed when not reported or not aligned with the impact estimates. For example, if the impact estimate is regression-adjusted but only unadjusted means are reported in the study, the unadjusted means are not displayed as they are not aligned with the adjusted impact estimate.
Impact estimates are not shown when the estimate units cannot be converted to natural units.
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the program. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
Participants were veterans who were formerly incarcerated; had at least one felony conviction; and were diagnosed with a substance use disorder, mental illness, or both. On average, sample members were 52 years old. Almost all (96 percent) were male. About two-thirds (68 percent) were Black or African American; 27 percent were White, not Hispanic; and 4 percent were Hispanic or Latino of any race. Participants had, on average, 13 years of education. Two-thirds of participants had experienced homelessness in the past year. In total, 88 percent reported a substance-use disorder, 45 percent reported depression, 10 percent reported a post-traumatic stress disorder, and 6 percent reported a cyclical mood disorder or psychosis.
Age
| Mean age | 52 years |
Sex
| Male | 96% |
Race and ethnicity
| Black or African American |
68%
|
| White, not Hispanic |
27%
|
| Hispanic or Latino of any race |
4%
|
| More than one race |
1%
|
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Family status
| Married | 7% |
Specific employment barriers
| Had a mental illness | 57% |
| Had a substance abuse disorder | 88% |
| Were involved with the justice system | 100% |
| Were fomerly incarcerated | 100% |
| Were experiencing homelessness | 67% |
| Were military veterans | 100% |
Program implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Program services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Program funding:
Study publications
LePage, James P., Avery A. Lewis, April M. Crawford, Julie A. Parish, Lisa Ottomanelli, Edward L. Washington, and Daisha J. Cipher (2016). Incorporating individualized placement and support principles into vocational rehabilitation for formerly incarcerated veterans, Psychiatric Services 67(7): 735-742. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27032655/.
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
19459- Individual Placemen