
Study design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase long-term earnings, Increase short-term employment, Increase long-term employment, Decrease short-term benefit receipt, Decrease long-term benefit receiptOther outcome domains examined:
NoneStudy funded by:
Results
Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Comparison group mean | Intervention group mean | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increase short-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 1 |
High ![]() |
525.00 | 884.00 | 359.00 | 2002 dollars |
![]() |
540 |
Increase long-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 2 |
High ![]() |
1,047.00 | 1,719.00 | 672.00 | 2003 dollars |
![]() |
540 |
Increase short-term employment | Employed for four consecutive quarters | Year 1 |
High ![]() |
1.80 | 3.10 | 1.30 | percentage points |
![]() |
540 |
Increase short-term employment | Ever employed, annual | Year 1 |
High ![]() |
12.80 | 20.20 | 7.40 | percentage points |
![]() |
540 |
Increase long-term employment | Employed for four consecutive quarters | Year 2 |
High ![]() |
4.90 | 8.80 | 3.90 | percentage points |
![]() |
540 |
Increase long-term employment | Ever employed, annual | Year 2 |
High ![]() |
14.60 | 19.60 | 5.00 | percentage points |
![]() |
540 |
Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of cash assistance received, annual | Year 1 |
High ![]() |
2,995.00 | 3,114.00 | 119.00 | 2002 dollars |
![]() |
540 |
Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of Food Stamps/SNAP benefits, annual | Year 1 |
High ![]() |
1,481.00 | 1,521.00 | 40.00 | 2002 dollars |
![]() |
540 |
Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of cash assistance received, annual | Year 2 |
High ![]() |
2,423.00 | 2,313.00 | -110.00 | 2003 dollars |
![]() |
540 |
Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of Food Stamps/SNAP benefits, annual | Year 2 |
High ![]() |
1,353.00 | 1,333.00 | -20.00 | 2003 dollars |
![]() |
540 |
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the intervention. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
Sample members were Safety Net benefit recipients without dependent children who were not eligible to receive disability-related benefits but who had physical or mental health problems that limited their ability to work. The average age of sample members was 47. Almost half (47 percent) of sample members were Black, 37 percent were Hispanic, and 12 percent were White. Only 24 percent worked in an unemployment insurance-covered job in the year before random assignment.
Age
Mean age | 47 years |
Participant race and ethnicity
Black or African American | 47% |
White, not Hispanic | 12% |
Another race | 3% |
Hispanic or Latino of any race | 37% |
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Participant employment and public benefit status
Were eligible for or receiving cash assistance | 100% |
Specific employment barriers
Had a chronic illness | 100% |
Intervention implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Intervention services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Intervention funding:
Study publications
Bloom, Dan, Cynthia Miller, and Gilda Azurdia (2007). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Personal Roads to Individual Development and Employment (PRIDE) program in New York City, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/era_pride.pdf.
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
2944.2944.02-New York City Employ