HighStudy design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase long-term earnings, Increase short-term employment, Increase long-term employment, Decrease short-term benefit receipt, Decrease long-term benefit receiptOther outcome domains examined:
Food security, health, well-being, housing statusStudy funded by:
Results
View table definitionsScroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
| Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Comparison group mean | Program group mean | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase short-term earnings | Annual earnings, UI data | Year 1 |
High
|
6,759.00 | 6,581.00 | -178.00 | 2017 dollars |
|
2,756 |
| Increase long-term earnings | Annual earnings, UI data | Year 3 |
High
|
7,828.00 | 7,880.00 | 52.00 | 2019 dollars |
|
2,756 |
| Increase short-term employment | Average number of quarters employed, UI data | Year 1 |
High
|
1.90 | 1.80 | -0.10 | quarters |
|
2,756 |
| Increase short-term employment | Ever employed, quarterly, UI data | Quarter 6 |
High
|
44.90 | 45.40 | 0.50 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Increase long-term employment | Average number of quarters employed, UI data | Year 3 |
High
|
5.20 | 5.20 | 0.00 | quarters |
|
2,756 |
| Increase long-term employment | Ever employed, quarterly, UI data | Quarter 12 |
High
|
37.20 | 38.30 | 1.10 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of AFDC/TANF benefits, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 1 |
High
|
147.00 | 118.00 | -29.00 | 2017 dollars |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of food stamps/SNAP benefits, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 1 |
High
|
1,823.00 | 1,827.00 | 4.00 | 2017 dollars |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Received AFDC/TANF, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 1 |
High
|
5.50 | 4.90 | -0.60 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Received food stamps/SNAP, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 1 |
High
|
98.80 | 99.00 | 0.20 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | received Medicaid, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 1 |
High
|
92.30 | 92.00 | -0.30 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of AFDC/TANF benefits, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 3 |
High
|
176.00 | 180.00 | 4.00 | 2019 dollars |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of food stamps/SNAP benefits, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 3 |
High
|
1,350.00 | 1,292.00 | -58.00 | 2019 dollars |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Received AFDC/TANF, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 3 |
High
|
5.90 | 5.30 | -0.60 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Received food stamps/SNAP, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 3 |
High
|
63.20 | 60.50 | -2.70 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Received Medicaid, annual, SNAP administrative data | Year 3 |
High
|
77.70 | 76.80 | -0.90 | percentage points |
|
2,756 |
Short-term outcomes are those measured 18 months or fewer after participants are first offered services. Long-term outcomes are those measured between 18 months and 5 years after participants are first offered services. Very long-term outcomes are those measured 5 years or more after participants are first offered services.
Means are not displayed when not reported or not aligned with the impact estimates. For example, if the impact estimate is regression-adjusted but only unadjusted means are reported in the study, the unadjusted means are not displayed as they are not aligned with the adjusted impact estimate.
Impact estimates are not shown when the estimate units cannot be converted to natural units.
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the program. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
The program targeted SNAP recipients who were new work registrants (participants who had not met any Federal exemptions from SNAP work requirements and were required to register for work, with new registrants not having received SNAP in the past six months) with self-identified barriers to employment, including substance use disorders, mental health disorders, housing instability, and/or criminal histories. Most participants were unemployed (86 percent), were White, not Hispanic (86 percent), and had a high school diploma or GED (81 percent). The majority of participants were female (56 percent).
Age
| Mean age | 39 years |
| Young adults (age 16-24) | 13% |
| Adults (age 25+) | 87% |
| Older adults (age 50+) | 22% |
Sex
| Female | 44% |
| Male | 56% |
Race and ethnicity
| Black or African American |
5%
|
| White, not Hispanic |
86%
|
| Hispanic or Latino of any race |
3%
|
| Asian |
1%
|
| Another race |
1%
|
| More than one race |
5%
|
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Employment and public benefit status
| Were employed | 14% |
| Were unemployed | 86% |
| Public benefits recipients | 100% |
Education
| Had a high school diploma or GED | 81% |
| Did not have a high school diploma or GED | 19% |
| Postsecondary credential | 15% |
| English learners | 1% |
Program implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Program services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Program funding:
Study publications
Dotter, Dallas, James Mabli, Barbara Carlson, Julie Hartnack, Mason DeCamillis, Nora Paxton, Amy Defnet, Peter Schochet, Gayle Hamilton, and Stephen Freedman (2021). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Interim summary report technical supplement. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/interim-evaluation-pilot
Dotter, Dallas, Kelley Monzella, James Mabli, Barbara Carlson, Julie Hartnack, Peter Schochet, Mason DeCamillis, Dan Thal, Leah Shiferaw, Amy Defnet, Nora Paxton, Stephen Freedman (2022). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Technical supplement. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/final-evaluation-pilot
Mabli, James, Gretchen Rowe, Gayle Hamilton, Julie Hartnack, and Peter Schochet (2021). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Interim summary report. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/interim-evaluation-pilot
Mabli, James, Gretchen Rowe, Gayle Hamilton, Julie Hartnack, Kristen Joyce, Peter Schochet, Dallas Dotter, and Kelley Monzella (2021). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Vermont interim report appendices. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/interim-evaluation-pilot
Mabli, James, Gretchen Rowe, Gayle Hamilton, Julie Hartnack, Kristen Joyce, Peter Schochet, Dallas Dotter, and Kelley Monzella (2021). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Vermont interim report. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/interim-evaluation-pilot
Mabli, James, Gretchen Rowe, Julie Hartnack, Kelley Monzella, Leah Shiferaw, Amy Defnet, Peter Schochet, Milena Raketic, and Dallas Dotter (2022). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Vermont final report appendices. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/final-evaluation-pilot
Mabli, James, Gretchen Rowe, Julie Hartnack, Kelley Monzella, Leah Shiferaw, Amy Defnet, Peter Schochet, Milena Raketic, and Dallas Dotter (2022). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Vermont final report. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/final-evaluation-pilot
Rowe, Gretchen, James Mabli, Julie Hartnack, and Kelley Monzella. (2022). Expanding Opportunities & Reducing Barriers to Work: Final summary report. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Policy Support. Available at: https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap-et/final-evaluation-pilot
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
101036.12-Study of Jobs for In