
Study design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase long-term earnings, Increase very long-term earnings, Increase short-term employment, Increase long-term employment, Increase very long-term employment, Increase education and trainingOther outcome domains examined:
Financial well-being, family structure and parenting, and job characteristicsStudy funded by:
Results
Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Comparison group mean | Intervention group mean | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increase short-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 1 |
High ![]() |
11,515.00 | 10,465.00 | -1,050.00 | 2019 dollars |
![]() |
775 |
Increase long-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 5 |
High ![]() |
23,169.00 | 22,026.00 | -1,143.00 | 2019 dollars |
![]() |
775 |
Increase very long-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 6 |
High ![]() |
24,087.00 | 24,935.00 | 848.00 | 2019 dollars |
![]() |
775 |
Increase short-term employment | Currently employed | Quarter 6 |
High ![]() |
71.40 | 71.60 | 0.20 | Percentage points |
![]() |
775 |
Increase long-term employment | Currently employed | Quarter 20 |
High ![]() |
74.20 | 77.80 | 3.60 | Percentage points |
![]() |
775 |
Increase very long-term employment | Currently employed | Quarter 24 |
High ![]() |
73.20 | 75.50 | 2.30 | Percentage points |
![]() |
775 |
Increase education and training | Received any college credential | Year 3 |
High ![]() |
17.00 | 29.00 | 12.00 | Percentage points |
![]() |
640 |
Increase education and training | Received exam-based certification or license | Year 3 |
High ![]() |
17.60 | 40.20 | 22.60 | Percentage points |
![]() |
640 |
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the intervention. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
Almost all the participants were Hispanic (99 percent) and female (93 percent), and most were younger than age 35 (79 percent). Most had a high school diploma or equivalent (90 percent), and 41 percent had some college experience. Participants' average annual household income was $21,051. In the 12 months leading up to the study, 42 percent received benefits from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Sex
Female | 93% |
Participant race and ethnicity
White | 1% |
Hispanic or Latino of any race | 99% |
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Participant employment and public benefit status
Were employed | 51% |
Were classified by authors as having very low incomes | 100% |
Participant education
Had a high school diploma or GED | 90% |
Did not have a high school diploma or GED | 10% |
Intervention implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Intervention services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Intervention funding:
Cost information:
These figures are based on cost information reported by study authors. The Pathways Clearinghouse converted that information to a single amount expressed in 2018 dollars; for details, see the FAQ. This information is not an official price tag or guarantee.
Study publications
Gardiner, Karen, and Amanda Grittner (2022). Instituto del Progreso Latino’s Carreras en Salud program: Six-year impact report, OPRE Report #2022-47, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/opre-carreras%206-year%20impact%20report%20january%202022.pdf.
Gardiner, Karen, and Randall Juras (2019). Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education (PACE): Cross-program implementation and impact study findings, OPRE Report #2019-32, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/pathways-advancing-careers-and-education-pace-cross-program-implementation-and-impact.
Gardiner, Karen, Karin Martinson, and Samuel Dastrup (2021). Instituto del Progreso Latino’s Carreras en Salud program: Three-year impact report, OPRE Report #2021-97, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/instituto-del-progreso-latinos-carreras-en-salud-program-three-year-impact-report.
Judkins, David, Emily Roessel, and Gabriel Durham (2022). Appendices for PACE six-year impact reports, OPRE Report #2022-69, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/pace%20six-year%20impact%20report%20technical%20appendix%2003-2022.pdf
Martinson, Karin, Elizabeth Copson, Karen Gardiner, and Daniel Kitrosser (2018). Instituto del Progreso Latino's Carreras en Salud Program: Implementation and early impact report, OPRE Report #2018-06, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/report/instituto-del-progreso-latinos-carreras-en-salud-program-implementation-and-early.
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
24989.06-Carreras en Salud (C