Use the filters to search for studies with a particular study quality rating or that test a specific program or use the keyword search to find studies that the Pathways to Work Evidence Clearinghouse has reviewed. For more information about how Pathways to Work reviews studies, read about our methods and standards.
Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Fort Worth
Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase Employment Retention and Advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas ERA site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Houston
Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase Employment Retention and Advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Single parents in Corpus Christi
Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase employment retention and advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas ERA site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Two-parent families in Corpus Christi
Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase employment retention and advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas ERA site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Williams, Sonya, and Stephen Freedman (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Background characteristics and patterns of employment, earnings, and public assistance receipt of adults in two-parent families, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/background-characteristics-and-patterns-employment-earnings-and-public-assistance.