Share this program

  • -0.14,1.00
  • -0.12,2.25
  • -0.06,1.00
  • -0.08,1.00

Summary

The Los Angeles County Transitional Subsidized Employment Program—On-the-Job Training (OJT) provided partially subsidized work opportunities to move Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients into unsubsidized permanent employment. This evaluation directly compared OJT to a separate program, Paid Work Experience (PWE), in order to better understand which of the two programs might be more effective; the distinctive features of OJT include job placement in the for-profit sector without job search assistance.

At the time this evaluation occurred, two Transitional Subsidized Employment programs were active in Los Angeles County: OJT and a paid work experience (PWE) program. OJT placed participants in a partially subsidized, six-month position at a for-profit, private-sector organization, where they were paid $8 an hour by the local Workforce Investment Board (WIB) for the first two months. The program aimed to have participants make the transition into unsubsidized positions with the same employer when the subsidy ended. The average placement lasted two and a half months.

TANF recipients who were not exempt from TANF work requirements were referred to Greater Avenues for Independence (GAIN), the county’s welfare-to-work program. (Work requirement exemptions could be due to having very young children, having a disability, or caring for an ill or disabled person.) Participants who were not able to find unsubsidized work during their four-week job search under GAIN were recruited for Transitional Subsidized Employment if they met the following additional criteria: (1) able to work the hours required by OJT or PWE; (2) had at least five months of TANF eligibility remaining; (3) did not participate in Transitional Subsidized Employment in the last year; (4) did not have major employment barriers; and (5) had demonstrated to staff that they could and wanted to work (assessed by staff in various ways across locations). OJT was offered in Los Angeles County, CA.

This evaluation of OJT also analyzes the PWE model, and a comparison of OJT versus PWE. The effectiveness of OJT when compared with the PWE indicates the effect of being referred to a set of services that includes those unique to OJT; the comparison indicates how much better the offer of OJT meets participants’ needs than the offer of PWE. The Workforce Investment Board only paid participants’ wages for the first two months of each OJT job placement, compared to all six months of each PWE placement; this meant that, starting in the third month, employers had to add OJT participants to their payroll and would receive a partial subsidy PWE participants were placed in the nonprofit and public sectors, whereas OJT participants were placed in the for-profit sector. Unlike PWE participants, those in OJT could not receive wages for any time spent searching for jobs, nor did they have access to job search assistance from case managers. The evaluation of OJT as compared with PWE also tested OJT and PWE separately, compared with other services available in the community.

Populations and employment barriers: Public benefits recipients, Cash assistance recipients, Unemployed, Parents, Single parents

Implementation at a glance

Primary service
On-the-job training
Program services
Case management, Job placement, On-the-job training, Subsidized employment/transitional jobs
Setting(s)
Tested in multiple settings
Year evaluation began
2012
Implementing organization(s)The Los Angeles County Department of Public Social Services; South Bay Workforce; 21 Worksource Centers

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

View table definitions

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2024 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Not supported unfavorable $-2,005 per year -0.055 1745
Long-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable $-1,312 per year -0.036 1745
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase employment Short-term Not supported unfavorable -1% (in percentage points) -0.036 1745
Long-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable -1% (in percentage points) -0.028 1745
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Not supported unfavorable $481 per year 0.140 1745
Long-term Not supported unfavorable $234 per year 0.068 1745
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods Little evidence to assess support favorable 1% (in percentage points) 0.022 1398

Effectiveness ratings

  • Well- supported
  • Supported
  • Mixed support
  • Not supported
  • Insufficient evidence
  • Cannot assess support

Studies of this program

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1

Program cost

No cost information available.

Cost results

Estimate (in 2024 dollars) Quality of cost analysis that produced the estimate
Total program cost, per participant $8,607
Interpret cost findings with caution

Cost information

How much did the program cost per participant?

The average total program cost per participant was $8,607 in 2024 dollars. This figure is based on cost information for this program reported in one cost study reviewed by Pathways to Work (for details, see the FAQ). This study received a rating of Interpret cost findings with caution for the cost analysis.

Cost information is not directly comparable across programs due to differences in the categories of costs reported and program length. Cost information is not an official price tag or guarantee.

Implementation details

Local context

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
32%
White, not Hispanic
7%
Asian
3%
Unknown, not reported, or other
4%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
55%

Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.