Share this program

  • 0.28,1.00
  • 0.17,1.00
  • 0.05,1.00

Summary

Ready, Willing and Able Pathways2Work (Pathways) provided job-readiness training, case management, transitional jobs, and subsidized internships to people recently released from prison to support participants in securing unsubsidized employment.

Pathways began with orientation activities, which included assessments of occupational skills and career interests. Participants were then placed in a transitional job which they worked for three days a week. They spent the other weekdays participating in nonwork activities provided by Pathways, such as job-readiness training, career-development workshops, and case management. Participants first worked in transitional jobs with street-cleaning crews or in the kitchen of the implementing organization, the Doe Fund. Next, they worked at a subsidized internship with a partner employer. Participants earned slightly more than minimum wage during the transitional jobs and internships. Participants who did not secure unsubsidized employment by the end of the internship participated in job-search activities. Participants could access job-readiness services, including computer training, financial literacy classes, and soft-skills training throughout their participation in the program. Participants received financial incentives, including $100 for securing an unsubsidized job and up to $1,000 if they were employed for 32 hours per week for 5 months. The program was designed to last for up to 24 weeks (one or two weeks of orientation, either six or eight weeks of transitional work, eight weeks of subsidized work, and six weeks of job-search assistance).

Pathways was implemented in New York City, NY. The evaluation of Ready, Willing, & Able was part of the Enhanced Transitional Jobs Demonstration (ETJD) evaluation, which also tested similar subsidized employment programs in Atlanta, GA (Good Transitions); Milwaukee, WI (Supporting Families Through Work); San Francisco, CA (TransitionsSF); Syracuse, NY (Parent Success Initiative); Indianapolis, IN (RecycleForce); and Fort Worth, TX (Next STEP).

Populations and employment barriers: Adults (age 25+), Unemployed, Justice involvement

Implementation at a glance

Primary service
Program services
Case management, Child support assistance, Financial education, Job readiness, Job search assistance, Paid work experience/internships, Performance- or behavior-based financial incentives, Soft skills training, Subsidized employment/transitional jobs
Setting(s)
Urban only
Year evaluation began
2011
Implementing organization(s)The Doe Fund

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

View table definitions

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2024 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Supported favorable $5,759 per year 0.158 1000
Long-term Little evidence to assess support favorable $437 per year 0.012 1005
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase employment Short-term Supported favorable 6% (in percentage points) 0.148 1000
Long-term Little evidence to assess support favorable 3% (in percentage points) 0.073 1005
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Cannot assess support
Long-term Little evidence to assess support favorable $-505 per year -0.147 673
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods Supported favorable 6% (in percentage points) 0.119 724

Effectiveness ratings

  • Well- supported
  • Supported
  • Mixed support
  • Not supported
  • Insufficient evidence
  • Cannot assess support

Studies of this program

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1

Program cost

No cost information available.

Cost results

Estimate (in 2024 dollars) Quality of cost analysis that produced the estimate
Total program cost, per participant $10,337
Good quality

Cost information

How much did the program cost per participant?

The average total program cost per participant was $10,337 in 2024 dollars. This figure is based on cost information for this program reported in one cost study reviewed by Pathways to Work (for details, see the FAQ). This study received a rating of Good quality for the cost analysis.

Cost information is not directly comparable across programs due to differences in the categories of costs reported and program length. Cost information is not an official price tag or guarantee.

Implementation details

Dates covered by study

The study ran from December 2011 to July 2022. Study enrollment ran from December 2011 to December 2013. Data collection occurred from December 2011 to July 2022, with outcomes measured using administrative data over an eight-year follow-up period and using survey data at 12-month and 30-month follow-ups.

Organizations implementing program

The Doe Fund, a social enterprise nonprofit, implemented the Pathways program. The Doe Fund operates the residential Ready, Willing, & Able program for people who were formerly incarcerated and experiencing homelessness; transitional and permanent housing facilities for individuals and families with low income; and street-cleaning, culinary, and pest-control social enterprises that are the sources of subsidized employment opportunities for participants.

Populations served

The study examined formerly incarcerated individuals. Most participants were male (96 percent). The majority of participants were Black (69 percent) and had a high school diploma or GED (65 percent). About two-fifths of participants (41 percent) were noncustodial parents.

Description of services implemented

The Pathways program provided four sequential stages of nonresidential services and supports to develop participants’ work and soft skills in increasingly independent settings.

Stage 1: Orientation. Participants attended a paid one- or two-week orientation in a cohort, participating in workshops on soft skills and learning about the transitional job options at the Doe Fund’s social enterprise street-cleaning or culinary businesses. For attending orientation, they received $15 total—later increased to $30—plus the cost of the subway. Participants also completed computer skills and vocational assessments as well as the Test of Adult Basic Education. Participants selected the type of transitional job they were interested in at the end of orientation and then moved through the other program stages with their cohort.

Stage 2: Transitional job. After orientation, participants worked for six to eight weeks in a transitional job for three days a week, either on a street-cleaning crew or in a kitchen. Participants received a starting wage of $7.40 per hour (slightly above the minimum wage of $7.25) for three days a week, 21 hours total. The starting wage changed to $8.20 per hour after November 2013, timed with an impending New York State minimum wage increase to $8.00. The program provided weekly subway cards, brown-bag lunches, and the option to be served breakfast and dinner at the Doe Fund program site.

Stage 3: Internship. After participants’ transitional job period ended, Pathways placed participants in an eight-week subsidized internship at a partner employer for three days a week, 21 hours total, based on their skills, background, career interests, location preferences, and internship slot availability. Participants received the same wage they received in Stage 2, paid by the program.

Stage 4: Job search. After the internship, participants not hired for unsubsidized employment where they interned received job-search assistance, including a weekly job club, for six weeks. The program paid participants the wage they received in their Stage 3 internship for three days a week (21 hours total) until the last week of the paid job search, when they received $15 total.

In addition to these central components, the program offered the following services:

  • Case management. Case managers met with participants as needed during their transitional jobs to help participants transition to life post-incarceration. Case management continued but was less frequent during the participant’s internship, occurring in weekly meetings as well as in a weekly internship support group.
  • Unpaid classroom-based activities. Participants attended a variety of classes for two unpaid days a week (15 hours total) during Stage 2 and 3. Topics included job readiness, financial education, soft skills, and parenting classes if participants had children who were minors.
  • Occupational skills training. Pathways offered a training on building maintenance that allowed participants to earn boiler, fireguard, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration certifications. It was unpaid, optional, and offered outside of work hours. Pathways reimbursed participants for test costs associated with earning certifications.
  • Child support assistance. Pathways helped develop a payment plan for participants who owed child support that involved deductions of $25 from their subsidized wages each month.
  • Post-intervention services. Pathways provided a financial incentive of $100 when participants got a job and up to $1,000 for retaining a job for at least 32 hours per week for five months (in $200 increments). Pathways also hosted monthly check-in events for graduates. The Doe Fund provided lifetime case management to graduates.

Participation was voluntary, and most program referrals came from parole officers. However, receiving enough referrals to fill program enrollment was challenging. Pathways staff reported that parole officers sometimes hesitated to refer participants to Pathways, rather than a competing subsidized job program for individuals with criminal records, because they knew the program randomly assigned participants to a comparison or program group. The program initially planned to serve only men but later enrolled some women to increase enrollment. Similarly, the program initially required applicants to pass drug tests but later began to enroll individuals who tested positive for alcohol and marijuana. (Pathways still required participants to pass regular drug tests while in the program.)

Implementation differed from initial plans in terms of the size and timing of cohorts. The program enrolled smaller but more frequent cohorts than originally planned and served multiple cohorts at the same time in different stages to reduce the attrition that had occurred among potential participants who had had to wait to enroll in the next available cohort. The Doe Fund also modified the program stages to shorten the time in orientation and transitional jobs and to extend participants’ time receiving paid job-search assistance.

Service intensity

Transitional jobs lasted either six or eight weeks; subsidized jobs lasted eight weeks; and the job-search stage lasted six weeks.

Comparison conditions

Individuals who were randomly assigned to the comparison group could not participate in the Pathways program, but they received a list of alternative resources, including 17 organizations such as the local American Job Centers. Another organization in the city, the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO), operated a transitional jobs program that was similar to Pathways; although CEO was not on the list of alternative resources, about one-third of comparison group members enrolled in that program.

Partnerships

New York City parole officers referred participants to the program.

More than 40 employers in New York City, including nonprofits, private companies, and public agencies, partnered with Pathways to employ participants in internships.

Staffing

Four career developers and one workforce development assistant, two senior work site supervisors and six work site supervisors, and up to six career pathways advisors provided the program’s central services. The career pathways advisors provided case management. Additional full-time staff included a program director, associate director, evaluation coordinator, administrative assistant, two education instructors, training coordinator, security guard, and dispatcher. Staff had case management backgrounds or were hired from other Doe Fund programs.

Fidelity measures

The study did not discuss any tools to measure fidelity to the program model.

Funding source

This program was funded by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration through a grant for the Enhanced Transitional Jobs Demonstration.

Local context

The program took place in New York City, NY.

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
69%
White, not Hispanic
1%
Asian
1%
Unknown, not reported, or other
2%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
27%

Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.