Share this program

  • 0.16,1.00
  • 0.14,1.25

Summary

STEP Forward’s goal was to help cash assistance recipients and other job seekers with low income find local employment opportunities. The program provided a subsidy to local employers for hiring participants and supported participants with counseling and weekly job fairs that connected them with employers.

Participants volunteered for the program and received job counseling and help preparing for interviews from their case managers. Case managers then identified job opportunities with partner employers suited to the clients’ skills and interests and scheduled job interviews for participants at weekly job fairs. Employers were given a monthly subsidy of at least $1,000 for up to five months for each participant they hired at the prevailing market wage for at least 25 hours of work per week. Staff also made referrals for educational and social services not provided by the program. The program provided services to its participants until they found jobs and did not provide follow-up services during employment. 

STEP Forward participants had either left Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), unemployment insurance, or other public assistance programs; were current Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients; or were from households with an annual income no more than 200 percent of the poverty level. STEP Forward was implemented in San Francisco, CA.

Populations and employment barriers: Adults (age 25+), Unemployed

Implementation at a glance

Primary service
Job search assistance
Program services
Case management, Childcare and/or early education, Employment coaching, Job development, Job placement, Job readiness, Job search assistance, Mental health services, Soft skills training, Subsidized employment/transitional jobs, Transportation assistance
Setting(s)
Urban only
Year evaluation began
2012
Implementing organization(s)The Human Services Agency of San Francisco

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

View table definitions

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2024 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Supported favorable $4,629 per year 0.127 811
Long-term Supported favorable $5,140 per year 0.141 811
Very long-term Little evidence to assess support favorable $3,353 per year 0.092 994
Increase employment Short-term Supported favorable 6% (in percentage points) 0.135 811
Long-term Little evidence to assess support favorable 2% (in percentage points) 0.041 811
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Cannot assess support
Long-term Cannot assess support
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods Little evidence to assess support favorable 3% (in percentage points) 0.050 664

Effectiveness ratings

  • Well- supported
  • Supported
  • Mixed support
  • Not supported
  • Insufficient evidence
  • Cannot assess support

Studies of this program

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1

Program cost

No cost information available.

Cost results

Estimate (in 2024 dollars) Quality of cost analysis that produced the estimate
Total program cost, per participant $4,701
Interpret cost findings with caution

Cost information

How much did the program cost per participant?

The average total program cost per participant was $4,701 in 2024 dollars. This figure is based on cost information for this program reported in one cost study reviewed by Pathways to Work (for details, see the FAQ). This study received a rating of Interpret cost findings with caution for the cost analysis.

Cost information is not directly comparable across programs due to differences in the categories of costs reported and program length. Cost information is not an official price tag or guarantee.

Implementation details

Dates covered by study

The study ran from November 2012 to July 2022. Study enrollment ran from November 2012 to March 2015. Data collection occurred from November 2012 to July 2022, with outcomes measured using administrative data over an eight-year follow-up period and using survey data at a 12-month follow-up.

Organizations implementing program

The Human Services Agency of San Francisco (HSA) operated STEP Forward as part of its subsidized employment initiative called JOBsNOW! HSA operates the city and county of San Francisco’s major public assistance programs, including TANF, SNAP, and County Adult Assistance (CAAP) programs.

Populations served

The study sample included CalFresh recipients (37 percent), recipients of TANF who had exhausted their benefits (27 percent), recipients of unemployment insurance who had exhausted their benefits (20 percent), and other people deemed eligible for services. The majority of participants were female (72 percent), had a high school diploma or equivalent (72 percent), parents (68 percent), and public benefits recipients (64 percent).

Description of services implemented

STEP Forward focused on rapidly getting participants interviews for a subsidized job. HSA anticipated that participants would quickly move through the program and interview for jobs. The following activities comprised STEP Forward:

  • Case management. Upon random assignment into STEP Forward, participants met with a case manager who assessed their job readiness on three factors: 1) if they had an up-to-date resume, 2) if they had access to child care and transportation, and 3) if they had appropriate interview attire. In practice, HSA staff identified additional barriers like mental health and substance use challenges and outdated job skills that also affected job readiness.
  • Work-readiness activities. If a participant was not considered job ready, case managers could help with resumes, mock interviews, soft-skills development, and career advice. They also referred participants to remedial and postsecondary education services. Social workers referred participants to external social services agencies as necessary. Most participants were not deemed immediately job ready.
  • Job fairs. HSA organized weekly job fairs with private employers specifically for participants in the JOBsNOW! and STEP Forward programs. If a participant was considered job ready, the case manager reviewed jobs that participants could interview for at the weekly job fair. The case manager signed the participant up for interviews that they thought would be a good match and the participant had expressed interest in. Interviews lasted about 15 minutes. Employers might hire a participant based on the interview alone or might invite participants to additional interviews.
  • Subsidized employment. Private employers could receive wage reimbursements from HSA for STEP Forward participants hired to work at least 25 hours a week at market wages. These were competitive jobs, meaning they were not created specifically for the program. Employers made all hiring decisions and were expected to put participant hires on the company’s payroll. Initially, HSA reimbursed all employers up to $1,000 a month for up to five months per participant. To attract employers offering higher wages, HSA increased subsidies for employers that paid at least $13.50 an hour by reimbursing 100 percent of a participant’s wages in the first month, 75 percent in the second month, and up to $1,000 a month for the last three months. The initial subsidy structure remained the same for employers paying less than $13.50 an hour.
  • Job club. At the weekly job club for program participants, job developers presented openings for that week’s job fair. Job club was intended to be a voluntary activity, but it became a central program service as the issues with job readiness became more apparent. If participants missed three job clubs in a row, a social worker would reach out to encourage them to return.

The study authors also characterized the employers as clients of HSA and STEP Forward because job developers recruited employers for the job fairs and participant interviews. Further, employers wanting to remain in HSA’s employer network had to agree to conditions intended to protect HSA clients, like retaining participants as employees as long as they met employers’ job performance standards.

Service intensity

Wage subsidies could last up to five months.

Comparison conditions

The comparison group was not offered STEP Forward services, but they could receive other HSA services and services they found in the community.

Partnerships

The Human Services Agency of San Francisco (HSA) partnered with MDRC to develop the STEP Forward program and research design of its evaluation. The National Transitional Jobs Network assisted with the implementation of the study.

Staffing

In addition to the case managers, staffing for STEP Forward included social workers and job developers at job club, who served as liaisons with employers and presented job openings for the upcoming week’s job fair.

The study authors did not include information on the number of staff or their training, degrees, or certifications.

Fidelity measures

The study did not discuss any tools to measure fidelity to the program model.

Funding source

This program was funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.

Local context

STEP Forward operated in San Francisco, CA, from 2012 to 2015, coinciding with significant labor market effects from the tech boom; the unemployment rate fell from 5.7 percent to 3.5 percent from 2013 to 2016. Although the median household income and educational attainment levels in San Francisco were higher than the rest of the country, there were few opportunities for people with less education or without the specific skills for the types of jobs that were driving the region’s economic growth. In addition, many people with lower incomes moved out of San Francisco because of rising costs of living, and participants in this study who remained in the city faced additional disadvantages as they did not have the resources to move.

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
42%
White, not Hispanic
9%
Asian
23%
More than one race
4%
Unknown, not reported, or other
3%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
19%

Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.