Share this program

  • 0.44,1.50
  • -0.01,1.50

Summary

The Transitional Work Corporation (TWC) initiated a transitional jobs program to provide subsidized jobs to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients. This evaluation directly compared TWC to a separate program, Success Through Employment Preparation (STEP), in order to better understand which of the two programs might be more effective; the distinctive features of TWC’s transitional jobs program when compared to STEP are subsidized employment and retention bonuses.

The TWC’s transitional jobs program began with a two-week orientation, and from 2004 to 2007, the TWC paid participants a stipend of $25 for each day of orientation that they attended. The TWC staff then used information from interest assessments and other orientation tools to place participants in a transitional, subsidized job where the TWC paid them minimum wage. The TWC also trained on-site partners to mentor participants in the workplace. Participants worked at those jobs for 25 hours per week for up to six months. Throughout the orientation and participation in transitional jobs, participants met regularly with career advisors. During the transitional jobs, they also participated in 10 hours per week of other professional development activities, including job mentoring, job search assistance, and general education diploma preparation. The TWC staff helped participants find unsubsidized employment, typically seeking positions paying more than minimum wage. Participants were eligible for retention bonuses of up to $800 after six months of full-time employment in a permanent job. The transitional jobs program was implemented in Philadelphia, PA.

This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of TWC’s transitional jobs program compared to STEP. As a result, the findings from this evaluation indicate the effect of being referred to a set of services that are unique to TWC’s transitional jobs or how much better the offer of TWC’s transitional jobs program met participants’ needs than the offer of STEP. Both programs offered support in identifying and securing permanent, unsubsidized employment. However, TWC’s program focused on subsidized employment and offered job retention bonuses, whereas STEP focused on intensive case management to address specific barriers to employment. The Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration also evaluated TWC’s program and STEP independently.

Populations and employment barriers: Public benefits recipients, Cash assistance recipients, Unemployed, Parents

Implementation at a glance

Primary service
Program services
Basic skills/bridge programs, Case management, Job placement, Job readiness, Job search assistance, Performance- or behavior-based financial incentives, Post-employment participant follow-up, Soft skills training, Subsidized employment/transitional jobs
Setting(s)
Urban only
Year evaluation began
2004
Implementing organization(s)Transitional Work Corporation

Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain

View table definitions

Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns

Outcome domain Term Effectiveness rating Effect in 2024 dollars and percentages Effect in standard deviations Sample size
Increase earnings Short-term Little evidence to assess support $0 per year 0.000 0
Long-term Cannot assess support
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase employment Short-term Little evidence to assess support favorable 18% (in percentage points) 0.443 1456
Long-term Cannot assess support
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Decrease benefit receipt Short-term Little evidence to assess support unfavorable $41 per year 0.012 1456
Long-term Cannot assess support
Very long-term Cannot assess support
Increase education and training All measurement periods Cannot assess support

Effectiveness ratings

  • Well- supported
  • Supported
  • Mixed support
  • Not supported
  • Insufficient evidence
  • Cannot assess support

Studies of this program

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
High High 1

Program cost

No cost information available.

Cost results

Estimate (in 2024 dollars) Quality of cost analysis that produced the estimate
Total program cost, per participant $5,768
Good quality

Cost information

How much did the program cost per participant?

The average total program cost per participant was $5,768 in 2024 dollars. This figure is based on cost information for this program reported in one cost study reviewed by Pathways to Work (for details, see the FAQ). This study received a rating of Good quality for the cost analysis.

Cost information is not directly comparable across programs due to differences in the categories of costs reported and program length. Cost information is not an official price tag or guarantee.

Implementation details

Local context

Characteristics of research participants
Black or African American
80%
White, not Hispanic
3%
Unknown, not reported, or other
2%
Hispanic or Latino of any race
16%

Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.