Share this program

Summary

The Building Health and Wealth Network – Full Program promoted self-sufficiency among participants through a peer support group, financial empowerment classes, and financial support. This evaluation directly compared the Building Health and Wealth Network – Full Program to a separate program, the Building Health and Wealth Network – Partial Program, to better understand which of the two programs might be more effective; the distinctive feature of the Full Program is a weekly, trauma-informed peer support group.

The Building Health and Wealth Network – Full Program used a 28-week curriculum that included a weekly 4-hour peer support group and 3-hour financial empowerment class. The peer support group, which was unique to the Full Program, used a trauma-informed approach to guide participants toward a more financially stable foundation. Financial empowerment classes covered topics such as saving for education, housing, entrepreneurial activities, retirement, improving credit, and reducing debt. The program also helped participants open a credit union savings account, and matched any contributions the participant made during the program.

All participants were the primary caregiver of one or more children younger than 6, were receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits, and were required to work at least 20 hours per week to receive these TANF benefits.

Building Health and Wealth Network was implemented in Philadelphia, PA. Comparing the effectiveness of the Full Program with the effectiveness of the Partial Program indicates the effect of being referred to a set of services that includes those unique to the Full Program. The comparison indicates how much better the Full Program meets participants’ needs than the Partial Program does. The Full Program and Partial Program provided the same services for the same duration, except for the weekly peer support group, which was unique to the Full Program.

Populations and employment barriers: Public benefits recipients, Cash assistance recipients, Unemployed, Parents, Single parents

Effectiveness ratings

  • Well- supported
  • Supported
  • Mixed support
  • Not supported
  • Insufficient evidence
  • Cannot assess support

Studies of this program

Study quality rating Study counts per rating
Low Low 1

Implementation details

Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.