HighStudy design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase long-term earnings, Increase very long-term earnings, Increase short-term employment, Increase long-term employment, Increase very long-term employment, Decrease short-term benefit receipt, Decrease long-term benefit receiptOther outcome domains examined:
Physical health, Mental health, Housing, Couple relationships, Family formationStudy funded by:
Results
View table definitionsScroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
| Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Comparison group mean | Program group mean | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase short-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 1 |
High
|
1,642.00 | 1,908.00 | 266.00 | 1991 dollars |
|
22,791 |
| Increase long-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 5 |
High
|
3,107.00 | 3,800.00 | 693.00 | 1995 dollars |
|
22,791 |
| Increase very long-term earnings | Average annual earnings | Years 7-9 |
High
|
5,206.00 | 5,871.00 | 665.00 | 1999 dollars |
|
1,205 |
| Increase very long-term earnings | Average annual earnings | Years 7-9 |
High
|
3,386.00 | 3,689.00 | 303.00 | 1999 dollars |
|
4,396 |
| Increase very long-term earnings | Average annual earnings | Years 7-9 |
High
|
4,174.00 | 4,585.00 | 411.00 | 1999 dollars |
|
5,508 |
| Increase very long-term earnings | Average annual earnings | Years 7-9 |
High
|
4,948.00 | 5,394.00 | 446.00 | 1999 dollars |
|
8,219 |
| Increase short-term employment | Ever employed, annual | Year 1 |
High
|
35.50 | 39.60 | 4.10 | percentage points |
|
22,791 |
| Increase long-term employment | Ever employed, annual | Year 5 |
High
|
36.40 | 39.40 | 3.00 | percentage points |
|
22,791 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average employment, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
40.90 | 41.00 | 0.10 | percentage points |
|
8,219 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average employment, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
37.80 | 39.30 | 1.50 | percentage points |
|
5,508 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average employment, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
33.10 | 36.90 | 3.80 | percentage points |
|
4,396 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average employment, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
45.30 | 45.30 | 0.00 | percentage points |
|
1,205 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average quarters worked, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
1.28 | 1.32 | 0.04 | quarters |
|
8,219 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average quarters worked, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
1.15 | 1.23 | 0.08 | quarters |
|
5,508 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average quarters worked, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
1.03 | 1.16 | 0.13 | quarters |
|
4,396 |
| Increase very long-term employment | Average quarters worked, annual | Years 7-9 |
High
|
1.42 | 1.47 | 0.05 | quarters |
|
1,205 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of AFDC/TANF benefits, annual | Quarter 4 |
High
|
6,235.00 | 5,963.00 | -272.00 | 1991 dollars |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of Food Stamps/SNAP benefits, annual | Year 1 |
High
|
958.00 | 938.00 | -20.00 | 1991 dollars |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Received AFDC/TANF, quarterly | Quarter 4 |
High
|
76.40 | 73.40 | -3.00 | percentage points |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Received Food Stamps/SNAP, quarterly | Quarter 4 |
High
|
69.20 | 66.70 | -2.50 | percentage points |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of AFDC/TANF benefits, annual | Year 5 |
High
|
2,839.00 | 2,580.00 | -259.00 | 1995 dollars |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of Food Stamps/SNAP benefits, annual | Year 3 |
High
|
990.00 | 953.00 | -37.00 | 1993 dollars |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Received AFDC/TANF, quarterly | Quarter 20 |
High
|
42.50 | 39.30 | -3.20 | percentage points |
|
22,791 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Received Food Stamps/SNAP, follow-up period | Years 1-3 |
High
|
89.00 | 89.10 | 0.10 | percentage points |
|
22,791 |
Short-term outcomes are those measured 18 months or fewer after participants are first offered services. Long-term outcomes are those measured between 18 months and 5 years after participants are first offered services. Very long-term outcomes are those measured 5 years or more after participants are first offered services.
Means are not displayed when not reported or not aligned with the impact estimates. For example, if the impact estimate is regression-adjusted but only unadjusted means are reported in the study, the unadjusted means are not displayed as they are not aligned with the adjusted impact estimate.
Impact estimates are not shown when the estimate units cannot be converted to natural units.
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the program. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
Across counties, the single-parent sample was 25 percent Black, 27 percent Hispanic, and 40 percent White. The average age of the sample at the time of random assignment was 35.
Age
| Mean age | 35 years |
| Young adults (age 16-24) | 8% |
| Adults (age 25+) | 92% |
Race and ethnicity
| Black or African American |
25%
|
| White, not Hispanic |
40%
|
| Hispanic or Latino of any race |
27%
|
| Asian |
3%
|
| Unknown, not reported, or other |
2%
|
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Family status
| Parents | 100% |
| Single parents | 100% |
Employment and public benefit status
| Were employed | 8% |
| Were unemployed | 92% |
| Public benefits recipients | 100% |
| Cash assistance recipients | 100% |
Education
| Had a high school diploma or GED | 50% |
| Did not have a high school diploma or GED | 50% |
| English learners | 17% |
Specific employment barriers
| Were refugees | 6% |
Program implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Program services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Program funding:
Cost information:
These figures are based on cost information reported by study authors. The Pathways to Work converted that information to a single amount expressed in 2024 dollars; for details, see the FAQ. This information is not an official price tag or guarantee.
Study publications
Freedman, Stephen, Daniel Friedlander, Winston Lin, and Amanda Schweder (1996). The GAIN evaluation: Five-year impacts on employment, earnings, and AFDC receipt, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/full_561.pdf.
Friedlander, Daniel, James Riccio, and Stephen Freedman (1993). GAIN: Two-year impacts in six counties, New York: MDRC.
Hotz, V. Joseph, Guido W. Imbens, and Jacob A. Klerman (2006). Evaluating the differential effects of alternative welfare-to-work training components: A re-analysis of the California GAIN program, Journal of Labor Economics 24(3): 521-566. Available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/imbens/files/evaluating_the_differential_effects_of_alternative_welfare-to-work_training_components_a_re-analysis_of_the_california_gain_program.pdf.
Martinson, Karin, and Daniel Friedlander (1994). GAIN: Basic education in a welfare-to-work program, New York: MDRC. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED368915.
Riccio, James, and Daniel Friedlander (1992) GAIN: Program strategies, participation patterns, and first-year impacts in six counties, New York: MDRC. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED345089.pdf.
Riccio, James, Daniel Friedlander, and Stephen Freedman (1994). GAIN: Benefits, costs, and three-year impacts of a welfare-to-work program, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/gain_benefits_costs_fr.pdf.
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
3176.3176.01-Study of Greater Ave