HighStudy design
Design:
Study group formation:
Time period of study:
Primary outcome domains examined:
Increase short-term earnings, Increase long-term earnings, Increase short-term employment, Increase long-term employment, Decrease short-term benefit receipt, Decrease long-term benefit receipt, Increase education and trainingOther outcome domains examined:
Attitudes and expectations, Independence, Job characteristics, Health insurance, Criminal justice, Living arrangementsStudy funded by:
Results
View table definitionsScroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
| Outcome domain | Measure | Timing | Study quality by finding | Impact | Units | Findings | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase short-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 1 |
High
|
-3.00 | 2008 dollars |
|
673 |
| Increase short-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 1 |
High
|
81.00 | 2008 dollars |
|
827 |
| Increase long-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 3 |
High
|
469.00 | 2008 dollars |
|
717 |
| Increase long-term earnings | Annual earnings | Year 3 |
High
|
208.00 | 2008 dollars |
|
827 |
| Increase short-term employment | Currently employed | Month 12 |
High
|
5.30 | percentage points |
|
717 |
| Increase short-term employment | Currently employed | Month 12 |
High
|
1.20 | percentage points |
|
710 |
| Increase short-term employment | Ever employed, annual | Year 1 |
High
|
3.70 | percentage points |
|
827 |
| Increase short-term employment | Percentage of weeks worked, annual | Year 1 |
High
|
1.90 | percentage points |
|
720 |
| Increase long-term employment | Ever employed, annual | Year 3 |
High
|
1.40 | percentage points |
|
827 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Amount of SSA benefits, annual | Year 1 |
High
|
83.00 | 2008 dollars |
|
837 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Any person in household currently receives SNAP | Month 12 |
High
|
2.00 | percentage points |
|
738 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Any person in household currently receives TANF | Month 12 |
High
|
-1.20 | percentage points |
|
697 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Currently receives public health insurance | Month 12 |
High
|
-2.10 | percentage points |
|
692 |
| Decrease short-term benefit receipt | Received SSA benefits, annual | Year 1 |
High
|
-0.50 | percentage points |
|
837 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Amount of SSA benefits, annual | Year 3 |
High
|
540.00 | 2008 dollars |
|
827 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Receipt of TANF, SNAP, or housing assistance, monthly | Month 36 |
High
|
-1.70 | percentage points |
|
686 |
| Decrease long-term benefit receipt | Received SSA benefits, annual | Year 3 |
High
|
2.50 | percentage points |
|
827 |
| Increase education and training | Received high school diploma or GED | 36 months |
High
|
27.00 | percentage points |
|
716 |
Short-term outcomes are those measured 18 months or fewer after participants are first offered services. Long-term outcomes are those measured between 18 months and 5 years after participants are first offered services. Very long-term outcomes are those measured 5 years or more after participants are first offered services.
Means are not displayed when not reported or not aligned with the impact estimates. For example, if the impact estimate is regression-adjusted but only unadjusted means are reported in the study, the unadjusted means are not displayed as they are not aligned with the adjusted impact estimate.
Impact estimates are not shown when the estimate units cannot be converted to natural units.
High
Moderate
The findings quality describe our confidence that a given study’s finding is because of the program. We do not display findings that rate low.
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large favorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small favorable finding that might be due to chance
A favorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A favorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A moderate-to-large unfavorable finding that might to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance
A small unfavorable finding that might be due to chance
An unfavorable finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
An unfavorable finding that might be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size
A finding that is unlikely to be due to chance, but we cannot determine the standardized effect size or direction
A finding of no effect that might be due to chance
Sample characteristics
The study focused on people ages 16 to 25 who received SSA disability benefits. The sample was 62 percent male, 55 percent White, 35 percent Black, and 9 percent Hispanic (of any race). At baseline, about two-fifths (42 percent) had never worked for pay, 95 percent received Supplemental Security Income, and 96 percent received public health insurance. The average age of participants was 20, and, at baseline, 52 percent were attending school. Forty percent had a high school diploma or equivalent certification. All people in the study had a disability, with cognitive or developmental disabilities (44 percent), physical disabilities (19 percent), and mental illness (18 percent) reported most often as an individual’s primary disabling condition.
Age
| Mean age | 20 years |
| Young adults (age 16-24) | 100% |
Sex
| Female | 39% |
| Male | 61% |
Race and ethnicity
| Black or African American |
35%
|
| White |
56%
|
| Hispanic or Latino of any race |
9%
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
1%
|
| Unknown, not reported, or other |
8%
|
The race and ethnicity categories may sum to more than 100 percent if the authors reported race and ethnicity separately; in these cases, we report the category White, rather than White, not Hispanic.
Employment and public benefit status
| Were employed | 18% |
| Were unemployed | 82% |
| Public benefits recipients | 100% |
Education
| Had a high school diploma or GED | 42% |
| Did not have a high school diploma or GED | 58% |
Specific employment barriers
| Had a disability | 100% |
| Had a mental illness | 17% |
Program implementation
Implementing organization:
Program history:
Program services:
Mandatory services:
Comparison services:
Service receipt duration:
Program funding:
Cost information:
These figures are based on cost information reported by study authors. The Pathways to Work converted that information to a single amount expressed in 2024 dollars; for details, see the FAQ. This information is not an official price tag or guarantee.
Study publications
Fraker, Thomas, Alison Black, Arif Mamun, Michelle Manno, John Martinez, Bonnie O'Day, Meghan O'Toole, Anu Rangarajan, and Debbie Reed (2011). The Social Security Administration's Youth Transition Demonstration Projects: Interim report on Transition WORKS, Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Available at https://www.ssa.gov/disabilityresearch/documents/Erie%20Final%20Interim%20Report%202-22-11.pdf.
Fraker, Thomas, Arif Mamun, Todd Honeycutt, Allison Thompkins, and Erin Jacobs Valentine (2014). Final report on the Youth Transition Demonstration Evaluation, Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Available at https://www.ssa.gov/disabilityresearch/documents/YTD%20Final%20Report%20508%20Compliant%2011-11-2014.pdf.
View the glossary for more information about these and other terms used on this page.
Pathways to Work refers to programs by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some program names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.
25436-Transition WORKS