Skip to main content
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • Administration for Children & Families
  • Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation
Comment on proposed revisions to our standards by June 18:
Submit comments
Home

Main navigation

  • Find Interventions That Work
    •   Find Interventions That Work

      Identify, explore and compare the effectiveness of interventions designed to help low-wage job seekers succeed in the labor market.

    •  Study Search

      Find individual studies that have been reviewed by the Pathways Clearinghouse.

  • Other Pathways Resources
    • Publications and Multimedia
    • Evidence Snapshots
    • Evidence Gap Maps
    • Studies Underway
    • Population in Focus
    • Download Data
  • About Pathways
    • About
    • Recommend a study for us to review
    • Connect
  • Help
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Glossary
  1. Home
  2. Search for Studies

Search for Studies

Filter by

Study quality

Use the filters to search for studies with a particular study quality rating or that test a specific intervention or use the keyword search to find studies that Pathways has reviewed. For more information about how Pathways reviews studies, read about our methods and standards.

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4

Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Fort Worth

Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase Employment Retention and Advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas ERA site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Intervention: Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)

Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Houston

Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
​Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase Employment Retention and Advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families.  Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Intervention: Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)

Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Single parents in Corpus Christi

Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase employment retention and advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas ERA site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Intervention: Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)

Study of Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)—Two-parent families in Corpus Christi

Study quality: High
Study publications:
Redcross, Cindy, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell (2010). Benefit-cost findings for three programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project, New York: MDRC. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/benefit-cost-findings-three-programs-employment-retention-and-advancement-era-project.
Bloom, Dan, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener (2005). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Early results from four sites, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/early_results.pdf.
Hendra, Richard, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, Melissa Wavelet, Aaron Hill, and Sonya Williams (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: How effective are different approaches aiming to increase employment retention and advancement? Final impacts for twelve models, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-how-effective-are.
Martinson, Karin, and Richard Hendra (2006). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Texas ERA site, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/the-employment-retention-and-advancement-project-results-from-the-texas.
Williams, Sonya, and Stephen Freedman (2010). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Background characteristics and patterns of employment, earnings, and public assistance receipt of adults in two-parent families, Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at https://www.mdrc.org/publication/background-characteristics-and-patterns-employment-earnings-and-public-assistance.
Intervention: Texas Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA)
CONNECT WITH US
facebook twitter YouTube email
  • Find Interventions That Work
  • Find Interventions That Work
  • Study Search
  • Other Pathways Resources
  • Publications and Multimedia
  • Evidence Snapshots
  • Evidence Gap Maps
  • Developmental Interventions
  • Population in Focus
  • Download Data
  • About Pathways
  • About
  • Connect
  • Help
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Glossary
  • External Links
  • Accessibility
  • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
  • Contact USA.gov
  • Privacy Policy
  • Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

Copyright © Pathways to Work Evidence Clearinghouse, a project of the Office of Planning, Research, & Evaluation (OPRE) at the Administration for Children & Families (ACF)