ACE offered occupational and job readiness training within the workforce system. The types of training varied based on labor market demands at each of the nine intervention sites. ACE also offered learning assessments at program intake; integrated adult education and basic skills training; student support services, including individual case management and additional academic supports when necessary; and transition services, including job search and placement. The duration of the intervention was 12 months. The exact populations served varied by site; the study describes participants as workers with low skills and low wages. Eligible participants generally needed to possess basic skills, including language proficiency, that would allow them to benefit from the training, and have no significant personal factors that might present barriers to benefitting from the training. The intervention was implemented in nine sites located in Maryland, Connecticut, Georgia, and Texas.
Summary
The ACE model aimed to improve employment outcomes for workers with low skills through partnerships between Workforce Investment Boards and community colleges.
Populations and employment barriers:
Effectiveness rating and effect by outcome domain
Need more context or definitions for the Outcome Domain table below?
View the "Table help" to get more insight into terms, measures, and definitions.
Scroll to the right to view the rest of the table columns
| Outcome domain | Term | Effectiveness rating | Effect in 2018 dollars and percentages | Effect in standard deviations | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase earnings | Short-term | 
|
$2,719 per year
|
0.130 | 1513 |
| Long-term |  |
||||
| Very long-term | |
||||
| Increase employment | Short-term | |
|||
| Long-term | |
||||
| Very long-term | |
||||
| Decrease benefit receipt | Short-term | |
|||
| Long-term | |
||||
| Very long-term | |
||||
| Increase education and training | All measurement periods | |
* This intervention was assessed as supported for this domain, meaning it achieved one or more statistically significant, favorable effects. However, the intervention has an average effect size that is unfavorable because the average includes all effects in this domain - both statistically significant and favorable effects and statistically insignificant but unfavorable effects.
Effectiveness rating key:
-
Well-supported
-
Supported
-
Not supported
-
Mixed support
-
Insufficient evidence
-
No evidence
Studies of this intervention
| Study quality rating | Study counts per rating |
|---|---|
 Moderate
|
1 |
Implementation details
State(s) where implemented
The Pathways Clearinghouse refers to interventions by the names used in study reports or manuscripts. Some intervention names may use language that is not consistent with our style guide, preferences, or the terminology we use to describe populations.